I have been arguing for a reinstatement of the draft, without exceptions, for a very long time. Through the years my main argument for universal military service has focused on a simple equation that might reduce the likelihood of war.
The idea is that when the entire population (including the sons and daughters of lawyers, doctors, legislators and captains of industry) of a certain age is required to serve at least two years in the military, the political class will have a strong disinclination to pursue policies leading to wars of convenience. That their children and grandchildren could (would) be in the line of fire might focus their minds on the human consequences of their decision.
A similar notion has been behind legislation advanced by Congressman Charles Rangel over the years.
I still believe this to be a strong reason for the draft, but in an article in today's NYTs, a rationale was proposed that at least equals the one I've been advocating.
Follow me over the fold for more discussion on this critical issue.
